Cross-Examining vs. Curiosity
Posted on July 29, 2009
Use active listening skills when asking questions, advises Andrea Schneider (bio).
People know when you're asking questions to actually find out information versus when you're leading them down the primrose path of judgment in which you're just waiting to drop the sledgehammer at the end in order to prove that you were right.
So questions that sound like you're being cross-examined, questions that are really judgments in the form of questions are completely unhelpful, and people know that. So the questions really have to come from this stance of curiosity. I am genuinely curious to find out how you were thinking then. And that's hard. That's not an easy thing to keep the judgment out of your voice when what you're thinking is I'm really curious how you got to that insanely stupid conclusion based on the same data that I thought.
I mean, the point of the active listening and really trying to find out how they're thinking is so that you can better persuade them. If you're trying to persuade somebody to do something that you want, understanding where they're coming from is like having a map of the country you want to invade, right? You're trying to change their mind. You need to know where their mind is now in order to switch it.
Viewing Preferences
Video Interview
Downloads
Excerpted from interview with professor at the 2009 Career Development Institute for Psychiatry in Palo Alto, CA.
Feedback
Please note that the feedback is viewed only by 4researchers staff and is not intended for communication with individual contributors.
Use the form below to submit feedback about this article. If you would like a response, please be sure to include your e-mail address.







