Learn About
- Funding
- Research Design
- Participants
- Study Management
- Collaboration
- Dissemination
- Career Advancement
 | Take budget into consideration at the start of proposal development, recommends Hermi R. Woodward. Quick Tip - 3 minutes 19 seconds |
 | Budget and Career Development Plan Greg Siegle and Judith Ford give some advice about developing a budget and writing a career development plan for a K-award. Q&A |
| Common Mistakes of Senior and Junior Researchers Courtney Ferrell describes two pitfalls to avoid when submitting a research proposal. Quick Tip |
 | Consulting with a Biostatistician Helena Kraemer explains how and when to involve a biostatistician in your research study. Presentation - 1 hour 15 minutes 24 seconds |
| Hermi R. Woodward explores complications concerning minimum effort requirements. Quick Tip - 3 minutes 14 seconds |
| Decide what you want to do before you decide on how much money to ask for, advises Courtney Ferrell. Quick Tip - 58 seconds |
| Developing a K01 Research Plan Judith Ford and Greg Siegle provide practical hints for writing up each section of the K01 proposal. Q&A |
| Ruth M. O'Hara talks about learning to deal with summary sheets and other reviews. Quick Tip - 1 minute 3 seconds |
| Don't Assume Institutional Support Discuss funding with mentors and department chairs early in the game, states Hermi R. Woodward. Quick Tip - 1 minute 34 seconds |
| Get Input Before Submitting a Proposal David Brent encourages senior researchers to get input on their grant proposals. Quick Tip - 57 seconds |
| Team writing works well for Howard J. Aizenstein. Quick Tip - 1 minute 53 seconds |
| Getting Funding for Tribal Community Research Philip A. Fisher suggests questions researchers may want to ask themselves as they design tribal research and apply for grants. Quick Tip - 2 minutes 22 seconds |
| Question and method are clearly connected in a well-written grant proposal, suggests F. Xavier Castellanos. Quick Tip - 1 minute 45 seconds |
| It Took Me Awhile To Go Home That Day An anecdote from John B. Reid about his first grant. Quick Tip - 54 seconds |
| It is extremely important to understand the layers of sign-off for grant submission, states Hermi R. Woodward. Quick Tip - 1 minute 12 seconds |
| Meticulously check your grant for clarity, then have your colleagues do the same, advises Neal Ryan. Quick Tip - 2 minutes 56 seconds |
| Robert C. Malenka stresses the importance of aesthetics in grant writing. Quick Tip - 1 minute 27 seconds |
| Judy Garber stresses the importance of modeling your grants after those of successful peers. Quick Tip - 1 minute 25 seconds |
| Respond to feedback on submitted grants carefully, says Deborah Beidel. Quick Tip - 2 minutes 9 seconds |
| John Landsverk talks about getting a disappointing review from NIH. Quick Tip - 1 minute 7 seconds |
| Power Calculations for Each Hypothesis Dr. Guillermo J. Prado explains why a broad statement about power is not sufficient for a grant proposal. Quick Tip - 56 seconds |
| Judith Ford and Greg Siegle share some hints for responding to the NIMH critique of your grant. Q&A |
| Responding to Summary Statements Yonette Thomas advises early-career researchers how to respond to grant reviews. Quick Tip - 1 minute 12 seconds |
| Resubmitting Unscored Grant Proposals F. Xavier Castellanos describes the path between unscored and fundable grant proposals. Quick Tip - 1 minute 33 seconds |
| Wesley K. Thompson suggests that you pay close attention to the analysis section in your grant. Quick Tip - 45 seconds |
| If you have a controversial protocol, approach the IRB first and the funding body second, advises Christopher M. Ryan. Quick Tip - 1 minute 54 seconds |
| Deborah Beidel outlines the reviewer's role in the grant submission process. Quick Tip - 3 minutes 6 seconds |
| Thinking Ahead About the Details Include protocol details in the human subjects and budget sections of your grant, suggests Victoria J. Grochocinski. Quick Tip - 4 minutes 0 seconds |
| Timeline for Applying for a K01 Greg Siegle provides a practical way to approach your first K01 application. Q&A |
| Alan F. Schatzberg recommends being mindful of an assortment of potential costs. Quick Tip - 1 minute 27 seconds |
| At his university, the peer review process is based on sub-specialties, Michael E. Thase explains. Quick Tip - 3 minutes 40 seconds |
| When selecting preliminary data, you don't need to mine for diamonds, says Gary S. Sachs. Quick Tip - 2 minutes 11 seconds |
| Line-by-line analysis of grant proposals is expensive but invaluable, says F. Xavier Castellanos. Quick Tip - 2 minutes 5 seconds |
Featured Quick Tip |
Featured Quick Tip |